Teams

Powers GCC

2026 Combo 18 & Over-DLT · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-08vs Deloach-Greenville CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gnemi / Nancy Johnson vs Lisa Weathers / Brittany McTeer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKerri McQueen / Lindsay Powers vs Elizabeth Nipper / Meredith Loudon4-6, 4-6
2026-09-02vs Joel CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Waldrop / Nancy Johnson vs Jenifer Davidson / Misty Moseley6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLizzie Powers / Kimberly Gnemi vs Megan Wicker / Maghan Ashmore1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaryNeff Stewart / Allyn Camp vs Robin Toler / Mallory Burchfield0-6, 1-6
2026-08-30vs Hamrick - BearPenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Kimberly Gnemi vs Tracy Etheridge / Emily Melton6-2, 6-4
2026-08-24vs Joel CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSloane Fair / Sarah Waldrop vs Teresa Reed / Chloe Darden1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaryNeff Stewart / Jessica Barnes vs Leslie McPherson / Frances Varner4-6, 5-7
2026-08-19vs Deloach-Greenville CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Waldrop / Sloane Fair vs Amanda Azlin / Brittany McTeer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Brown / Lizzie Powers vs Brianne DeLoach / Rebecca Potter3-6, 6-7
2026-08-16vs WARD-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Kimberly Gnemi vs Blair Campbell Taylor / Kelsey Spradling0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSloane Fair / Nancy Johnson vs Kelli Williams / Taylor Ward4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sarah Waldrop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lizzie Powers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Lindsay Powers
published
2.64
Sloane Fair
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Kerri McQueen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
MaryNeff Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Gnemi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri McQueen + MaryNeff Stewart0534% games−8.8% vs expected
Lizzie Powers + Kimberly Gnemi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Waldrop
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lizzie Powers
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lindsay Powers
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Sloane Fair
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Kerri McQueen
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
MaryNeff Stewart
7W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
Kimberly Gnemi
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.