Teams

STAC-Wallace (4.0)

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Angela Keck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.22
Michelle O'Neil
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results5 ties
2021-04-24Split 11
L#2 DoublesAngela Keck / Aline Pereira vs Vicki Seaman / Johnni Cassidy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Tanya Bond vs Ellen Gallinatti / Lori Nehls3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-11Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Tanya Bond vs Lisa Kim / Misa Banks6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAline Pereira / Angela Keck vs Penny Woodruff / Michelle Harris6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Stacey Nelson vs Candace Hines / Jennifer Vana6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-03-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Nelson / Michelle O'Neil vs Lindsey Snow / Tamara Rosenbloom4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-03-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTanya Bond / Michelle O'Neil vs Teresa Myers / Tracey Hoy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Michelle O'Neil
69W–73L career
95%5%0%
3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.