Teams

4S:Mix it Wright:Gehrlein/Wright

2021 SCT Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.22 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-25vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Shields / Amanda Connell vs John Pagano / Pamela Jeppson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Williams / Eileen Allers vs Nan Cunningham / Mark Schiller2-6, 5-7
2021-03-21vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Long / Michelle Wright vs Yvonne D'aquino / Paul Groves6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmanda Connell / Peter Shields vs Maria Negron / Keith Cipollaro6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Sacco / Eileen Allers vs Natalie Schriefer / Alan Lindsay6-2, 6-2
2021-03-07vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Crawford / Allison Greenberg vs John Pagano / Wendy Harris5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Allers / Steven Williams vs Yvonne D'aquino / Paul Groves3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Dinardo / Richard Long vs Nan Cunningham / Jeffrey Brozek1-6, 2-6
2021-02-28vs MRC:Middlebury 9.0:SnellLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wright / Steven Williams vs Kimelle McCarthy / Peter Snell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Dinardo / Richard Long vs Shirley Berliner / Richard Makepeace2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEileen Allers / Peter Shields vs Julia Kivitz / Jeffrey Kivitz3-6, 2-6
2020-11-15vs MRC:Middlebury 9.0:SnellLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Greenberg / Christopher Crawford vs Julia Kivitz / Jeffrey Kivitz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Elliott / Richard Long vs Shirley Berliner / Brett Teolis4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Bergen / Peter Shields vs Kristine Heslin / Peter Snell2-6, 4-6
2020-10-18vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoWon 21
W#1 DoublesEileen Allers / Peter Shields vs Jeffrey Brozek / Nan Cunningham6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAllison Greenberg / Christopher Crawford vs John Pagano / Chandy Smith7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Magner / Gina Dinardo vs Steven Lubchansky / Pamela Pillo1-6, 3-6
2020-10-04vs MRC:Middlebury 9.0:SnellWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Gehrlein / Peter Shields vs Julia Kivitz / Jeffrey Kivitz1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Crawford / Michelle Wright vs Kimelle McCarthy / Scott Neufeld6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrett Howard / Allison Greenberg vs Richard Makepeace / Hannah Still5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Middlebury 9.0:Snell0791227204
24S:Mix it Wright:Gehrlein/Wright0771429212
3TCT:Club Ed:Pagano0817717163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Greenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.40
Amanda Connell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brett Howard
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.21
Eileen Allers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Rezan Zia
published
3.76
Richard Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
Christopher Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Gina Dinardo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gregory Magner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Debra Gehrlein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joseph Watson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Shields
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Connell + Peter Shields23557% games−7.6% vs expected
Allison Greenberg + Christopher Crawford3351% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Crawford + Michelle Wright4262% gamesnot enough data
Brett Howard + Allison Greenberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Allison Greenberg
31W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Amanda Connell
102W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Brett Howard
176W–56L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Eileen Allers
124W–86L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
Rezan Zia
27W–48L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Richard Long
98W–87L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christopher Crawford
45W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gina Dinardo
2W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gregory Magner
1W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Debra Gehrlein
32W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Joseph Watson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Wright
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Shields
156W–72L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.