Teams

Elysium 2

2022 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-01-20vs New AlbanyWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Jensen / Stacy Hartman vs Lisa Kessler / Claire Kopko6-4, 7-5
2022-01-13vs OlympicSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKara Casey vs Sarah Longhouse1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSacha Bonny / Catherine Bournstein vs Amber Dyer / Akta Malik3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-06vs WedgewoodWon 10
W#2 DoublesKara Casey / Sacha Bonny vs Alissa Sway / Erin Wilcox6-3, 6-1
2021-12-02vs Players Club 3Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Niekamp / Stacy Hartman vs Lori Hall / Heather Chiles6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSacha Bonny / Kara Casey vs Danielle English / ELIZABETH MASON7-6, 6-1
2021-11-11vs ScarboroughWon 10
W#2 DoublesKara Casey / DIANA BAIOCCHI vs Sarah Jackson / Alix Hoekzema6-1, 6-4
2021-11-04vs Elysium 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesSacha Bonny / Kara Casey vs Autumn Pochiro / Kelley Loredo6-0, 6-2
2021-10-21vs Racquet Club 1Won 20
W#1 SinglesStacy Hartman vs Roshi G Jamshidi7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bournstein / Kara Casey vs Paige Rogers / Caitlin Merriman6-3, 7-6
2021-10-14vs Players Club 2Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Hartman / Saree Ellis vs Jennifer Schoedinger / Sally Wolfe6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-07vs OlympicLost 01
L#2 DoublesSacha Bonny / Kara Casey vs Arica Worth / Akta Malik5-7, 2-6
2021-09-30vs WedgewoodWon 10
W#2 DoublesKara Casey / Stacy Hartman vs Kay Hartman / Pamela Hutchinson6-1, 6-0
2021-09-16vs Racquet Club 2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bournstein / Sacha Bonny vs Lynn Scioli / Laura Kleinschmidt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
DIANA BAIOCCHI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Heidi Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.54
Amy Niekamp
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.34
Kara Casey
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
Cindy Lane
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.21
Catherine Bournstein
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 2.5
Mary Jensen
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #1 Doubles 12% · published
Sacha Bonny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Saree Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Stacy Hartman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tiffanie Roberts
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Saree Ellis + DIANA BAIOCCHI3456% games+9.5% vs expected
Amy Niekamp + Kara Casey4558% games+9.0% vs expected
Saree Ellis + Cindy Lane7452% games+8.7% vs expected
Heidi Jensen + Amy Niekamp2346% games+8.6% vs expected
Saree Ellis + Catherine Bournstein4255% games+8.4% vs expected
Sacha Bonny + Kara Casey9457% games+6.7% vs expected
Cindy Lane + DIANA BAIOCCHI7456% games+5.4% vs expected
Cindy Lane + Heidi Jensen2648% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DIANA BAIOCCHI
46W–46L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Heidi Jensen
75W–81L career · 12 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Amy Niekamp
51W–66L career · 9 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kara Casey
50W–66L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Cindy Lane
34W–59L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Catherine Bournstein
49W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21
Mary Jensen
40W–51L career · 17 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sacha Bonny
25W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Saree Ellis
42W–87L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Hartman
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiffanie Roberts
57W–85L career · 18 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.