Teams

Shearwater - Bender

2026 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-20vs Duval/BoretskyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Ruiz / James Triplett vs MICHAEL ILOG / Anna Harper2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Ruiz / Dana Armstrong vs Dennis ILAGAN / Narong Khan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDean Uva / Deborah Davies vs Nathan Herr / Geraldine Millares1-6, 0-6
2026-01-30vs Duval/BoretskyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Triplett / NANCY MBUTHIA vs MICHAEL ILOG / Narong Khan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNei Moacir Rossatto De Medeiros / Deborah Davies vs Nathan Herr / Geraldine Millares2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Uva / Dean Uva vs Chris Middleton / Desi Middleton3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Thomas Stephen
published
3.08
James Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Nei Moacir Rossatto De Medeiros
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Maureen Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tami Bender
published
2.79
Randy Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Deborah Davies
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.63
Dean Uva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Dana Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Angela Uva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Dan Bender
published 2.5
Elise Wirtz
published
Janelle Modesitt
published
NANCY MBUTHIA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Subashini Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Stephen + Subashini Thomas1443% gamesnot enough data
Angela Uva + Dean Uva033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Stephen
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
James Triplett
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Nei Moacir Rossatto De Medeiros
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Maureen Ruiz
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Tami Bender
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Randy Ruiz
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
2.5
Deborah Davies
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
3
Dean Uva
0W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Dana Armstrong
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Angela Uva
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Dan Bender
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elise Wirtz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janelle Modesitt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
NANCY MBUTHIA
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Subashini Thomas
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.