Teams

L.McRee

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-08vs J.KomesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarisa Bryant / Rossi Evans vs Keshia Green / Alison Sinclair1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Gigi Martin6-1, 6-3
2023-05-01vs T.AndertonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRossi Evans vs Colleen Tapen6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Duke / Lanier McRee vs Elizabeth Vieira / Sofia Switzer6-2, 6-3
2023-04-24vs J.Albritton/CFelmetWon 10
W#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Kristi Gilreath vs Jenny Branch / Katherine Teague6-3, 6-1
2023-04-17vs S.FogartyWon 20
W#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Kristi Gilreath vs Cheri Kivisto / Kim Manning7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Kathryn West vs Deanna MacCormac / Michelle Metelo6-1, 6-1
2023-04-10vs D.Farmer2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Hallam / Kristen Duke vs Kisha Bryant / Henriette Nshunguye6-0, 6-1
2023-03-27vs T.CanterburyWon 20
W#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Catherine Wilborne6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Hallam / Emily Andino vs Brandy Mann / Monica Vance1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-13vs J.KomesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLanier McRee / Elizabeth Fassler vs Keshia Green / Alison Sinclair4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn West / Kristen Duke vs Jenny Komes / Rachel Sanders4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-06vs T.AndertonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Ferguson / Kristen Duke vs Clare Mayo / Lea Ricks6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Colleen Tapen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Vanessa Garrido
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Rossi Evans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Lanier McRee
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Kristi Gilreath
published
2.55
Kristen Duke
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.28
Emily Andino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Kathryn West
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Duke + Lanier McRee12756% games+2.5% vs expected
Lanier McRee + Rossi Evans5068% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Duke + Rossi Evans224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vanessa Garrido
67W–31L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Rossi Evans
142W–87L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Lanier McRee
120W–98L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Kristi Gilreath
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 7 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Emily Andino
36W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
0%96%4%
2.28
Kathryn West
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.