Teams

Sportime HI 18+ 4.0 Day

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 4.0 Day

20 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 DayLost 13
L#1 DoublesSuzie Hanna / Claudia Trulli vs Amy Suehnholz / Shannon Weber1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristine Durland vs Melissa Frank6-2, 4-3
L#2 DoublesLouise Barclay / Mia Mihopoulos vs Amanda Barrow / Shannon Smith3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Carlos / Amy Kline vs Rebecca Dickson / Kimberly Kraus6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesOlga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts vs Christina Bischoff / Elizabeth Smoltz6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristine Durland vs Julia McMillan4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Mia Mihopoulos vs Rebecca Dvorkin / Jennifer Marsh0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Solomon / Amy Kline vs Nicole Fiftal / Francine Pollack6-7, 3-6
2026-06-10vs SMC Crush Ballers 18+ 4.0 DayLost 13
W#1 DoublesLindsey Anderson / Jennifer Naso vs Misun Kim / Randi Siegel7-5, 4-3
L#1 SinglesDana Carlos vs Tamara Krstic2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Olga Orgielewicz vs Yaysoon Phillips / Jennifer Shim4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Safer / Linda Solomon vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Amy Lerner4-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs MIC: Holmes/Hatch - 18+ 4.0 WLost 13
L#1 DoublesOlga Orgielewicz / Jennifer Naso vs Cynthia Curry / Jane Foster1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristine Durland vs Allison Gibbs6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMiran Robarts / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Nora Holmes / Katie Nicholson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAudrey Smith / Dana Carlos vs Carolina Johnson / Tracey Forte4-6, 3-6
2026-05-20vs ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesLouise Barclay / Olga Orgielewicz vs Susan Lee / Hannah Finkelberg3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Miran Robarts vs Kimberly Kraus / Lisa Lubart3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Carlos / Susanne Sparks vs Amanda Barrow / Laura Zarba6-3, 3-6
2026-05-13vs APO and Friends - 18+ day leagueSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlison Brown / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Kimberly Heavey / Chase Haynes English4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDana Carlos vs Sarah Richardson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLouise Barclay / Sondra Lavin vs Lindsay Martin / Brooke Sanders6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Naso / Olga Orgielewicz vs Margot Sweeney / Elizabeth Lukes6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs TIA 4.0 Pettinato 18+ 4.0 DaySplit 22
W#1 DoublesLindsey Anderson / Jennifer Naso vs Dawn Hone / Berry Ravitz6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristine Durland vs Katherine Harcsar3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOlga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts vs Kimberly Many / Genevieve Pettinato4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAudrey Smith / Suzie Hanna vs Holly Collier / Kate Vaughey4-6, 6-7
2026-04-29vs Innis Arden: Net Assets 4.0 WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Naso / Sondra Lavin vs Courtney McKinney / Rachel Gigliotti3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLouise Barclay / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Laura Cramer / Rachel Kilcullen4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMiran Robarts / Christine Durland vs Jocelyn Michels / Kendra Lisowski4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APO and Friends - 18+ day league0821822238
2ATC Armonk Aces 18+ 4.0 Day0820825252
3NRRC Backhanded Compliments 18+ 4.0 Day08191232283
4TIA 4.0 Pettinato 18+ 4.0 Day08171333267
5MIC: Holmes/Hatch - 18+ 4.0 W08151437309
6SMC Crush Ballers 18+ 4.0 Day0892043306
7Innis Arden: Net Assets 4.0 W0882144343
8Sportime HI 18+ 4.0 Day0892247309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Louise Barclay
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Marjorie Eilertsen
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Jennifer Naso
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Audrey Smith
published 4
3.70
Claudia Trulli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Christine Durland
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Sondra Lavin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Miran Robarts
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Olga Orgielewicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Suzie Hanna
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.39
Aileen Calnan-Burke
published 3.5
3.37
Dana Carlos
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Meredith Safer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mia Mihopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Kiran Greaney
published
3.19
Linda Solomon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Amy Kline
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Alison Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lindsey Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Trulli + Meredith Safer6263% games+11.7% vs expected
Alison Brown + Louise Barclay14955% games+10.1% vs expected
Jennifer Naso + Sondra Lavin9356% games+8.9% vs expected
Kiran Greaney + Sondra Lavin15467% games+7.7% vs expected
Audrey Smith + Jennifer Naso8352% games+6.9% vs expected
Miran Robarts + Olga Orgielewicz111749% games−1.4% vs expected
Linda Solomon + Susanne Sparks3344% games−2.1% vs expected
Alison Brown + Miran Robarts6453% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louise Barclay
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Marjorie Eilertsen
123W–84L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Jennifer Naso
100W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Audrey Smith
57W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Claudia Trulli
68W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Christine Durland
102W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Sondra Lavin
87W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Miran Robarts
80W–103L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Olga Orgielewicz
33W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Suzie Hanna
5W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Aileen Calnan-Burke
97W–114L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dana Carlos
61W–35L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Meredith Safer
70W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Mia Mihopoulos
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kiran Greaney
52W–46L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Linda Solomon
27W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Kline
176W–140L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
4
Alison Brown
61W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.99
Lindsey Anderson
24W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.