Teams

IE-McDermott Park-Isle of Misfits-West

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-15vs IE-Canyon Crest-SorenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBambang Tamsur / John Espinosa vs Ryan Lieberman / Jerry Jeen Lee6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEric Dake vs Christian Henish6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWayne West / James Hoffman vs Francis de Giorgio / Richard Hart6-3, 5-1
L#3 DoublesGustavo Olmos / David Huang vs Alfonso Nevarez / Dang Nguyen5-7, 3-6
2025-01-25vs IE-Canyon Crest-SorenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Espinosa / Eric Dake vs Jerry Jeen Lee / Joe Lopez6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDarrell Millsap / Bambang Tamsur vs Ryan Lieberman / Francis de Giorgio3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYijun Zhang / Ehab Ateia vs Doug van Soest / David Duncan3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
James Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Dake
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Carlos Hansen
published 4
3.65
Gustavo Olmos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Chris Alvarez
published 4
3.63
Wayne West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Bambang Tamsur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Ehab Ateia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ethan Perkins
published 3.5
3.24
Yijun Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Darrell Millsap
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Alvarez + James Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Hoffman
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Eric Dake
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carlos Hansen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gustavo Olmos
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Chris Alvarez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Wayne West
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Bambang Tamsur
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Ehab Ateia
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Ethan Perkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yijun Zhang
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Darrell Millsap
21W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.