Teams

An.Redmond18M

2025 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-27vs As.Burch18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Kristine Potter vs Ashley Burch / Cameron Burch4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Johnson / Holly Santago vs Michelle Kurtz / Todd Blevins3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Lape / Brian Lape vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-13vs Jo.Hastings18MWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Santago / Brent Lamm vs Paige Alford / Amir Lyall6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Ratliff / Lori Jensen vs Suzanne Braga / William Slocum6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeanna Lape / Brian Lape vs Cassy Albertson / Landon White6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-06vs Ta.LeFevre18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeanna Lape / Michael Ratliff vs Kelly Townsend / Brent Townsend6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristof Jensen / Lori Jensen vs Tara LeFevre / Russell VanBlon6-7, 2-6
2025-06-29vs Sa.Kane18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Kristine Potter vs Holly Atkinson / Sandeep Sharma2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Johnson / Holly Santago vs Emily Rubin / Greg Cox0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Brent Lamm vs Laura Panebianco / Connor Beckerle6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-22vs As.Burch18MWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrent Lamm / Kristine Potter vs Brian Kaulback / Haleigh Broglin7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHolly Santago / Michael Ratliff vs Cristine Allison / Todd Blevins6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDeanna Lape / Brian Lape vs Melissa Cleary / John Cleary6-1, 6-2
2025-06-18vs Me.Everitt18M3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Santago / Michael Ratliff vs Rebecca Reynolds / Kyle Reynolds4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Jensen / Christof Jensen vs Claire Little / Edward Bernier6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Merdes / Robert Merdes vs Allyson Schneider / William K Rhodes3-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs Ta.LeFevre18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Ratliff / Deanna Lape vs Jacqueline Wolborsky / Brian Wolborsky6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Johnson / Amy Merdes vs Tara LeFevre / Mitchell Wolborsky5-7, 4-6
2025-05-25vs Sa.Kane18MWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Jensen / Christof Jensen vs Jennifer Kazmierczak / Jaydeep Punde6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Johnson / Kristine Potter vs Holly Atkinson / Sandeep Sharma4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Anne Redmond vs Anh Vu / Earl White7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-18vs Jo.Hastings18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Merdes / Amy Merdes vs Kathryn White / Landon White6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Lape / Brian Lape vs William Slocum / Suzanne Braga4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Brent Lamm vs Cassy Albertson / Thomas Albertson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michael Ratliff
published
3.41
Holly Santago
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Deanna Lape
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Brent Lamm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Potter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Lori Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Francisco Burbano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Amy Merdes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
2.92
Christof Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Brian Lape
published 3
2.69
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.54
Kimberly Lamm
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Lamm + Kimberly Lamm3948% games+3.8% vs expected
Lori Jensen + Christof Jensen8845% games−4.6% vs expected
Francisco Burbano + Kristine Potter4452% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Lape + Brian Lape033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Holly Santago
127W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Deanna Lape
141W–95L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Brent Lamm
153W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Kristine Potter
145W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Lori Jensen
107W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Merdes
90W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3.5
Christof Jensen
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Brian Lape
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Anne Redmond
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Kimberly Lamm
86W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.