Teams

GB: Gerhard

2021-22 NH Tri Level · Men 3.5-2021

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-17vs K:PorowskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Dear / Geoffrey Simard vs Chester Porowski / Terry Gould5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-12-11vs GB:RubinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeremy Dear / Adam Gerhard vs Brian Brower / Michael Rubin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-11-28vs K:PorowskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Gerhard / Geoffrey Simard vs Terry Gould / Chester Porowski1-6, 6-7
2021-11-15vs ALG:Frank:DeglerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Gerhard / Geoffrey Simard vs Jeffrey Degler / William Frank4-6, 0-6
2021-11-08vs ALG:Frank:DeglerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeremy Dear / Geoffrey Simard vs William Frank / Jeffrey Stone2-6, 3-6
2021-11-06vs GB:RubinLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Gerhard / Jeremy Dear vs Michael Rubin / Joe Lacerda3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5-2021 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jeremy Dear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Geoffrey Simard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Adam Gerhard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Gerhard + Geoffrey Simard101449% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Dear
54W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
3.5
Geoffrey Simard
32W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Adam Gerhard
104W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.