Teams

CHAMISAL TC 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Erin High
published 3.5
3.44
Casey Riddell
published 3.5
3.42
Amy Simpson
published 3.5
3.35
Sarah Saxby
published
3.29
Carolyn Gallego
published 3.5
3.04
Chantal Nelson
published 3
3.02
Andrea Neiman
published 3
2.99
Linda Toplarski
published
2.93
Julie Mccullough
published
2.85
Brenda Murdock
published 3
2.83
Dani Dayton
published 3
2.81
Trinh Retterer
published
2.71
2.69
Koh Stubbe
published
Natalie Lott
published
Sheryl Short
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koh Stubbe + Elaine de la Torre123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Toplarski + Sarah Saxby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin High
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Casey Riddell
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Amy Simpson
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Sarah Saxby
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Gallego
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Chantal Nelson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Andrea Neiman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Linda Toplarski
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Julie Mccullough
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Brenda Murdock
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dani Dayton
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.83
Trinh Retterer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Elaine de la Torre
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Koh Stubbe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Natalie Lott
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheryl Short
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.