Teams

Marion/Teixeira/40&over3.0M

2025 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult Men 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesChaya Jollu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-30vs FK McClureWon 40
W#1 DoublesTyler Jones / Larry Pennington vs Chris Vorisek / Donald McWee7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndre Teixeira vs Forwen DelaRosa6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDan Livingston / David Lo Vece vs Timothy Roberson / Gerald Snyder7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCuppy Steven / Jack Gandolfo vs Jayms McClure / Jessie Labasbas6-2, 6-3
2025-05-17vs FK McClureLost 01
L#2 DoublesChaya Jollu / David Lo Vece vs Rick Durham / Jayms McClure6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2025-05-09vs FK McClureWon 31
L#1 DoublesDan Livingston / Larry Pennington vs Rick Durham / Chris Vorisek3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesPatrick McManus vs Donald McWee6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDave Mathieu / Tyler Jones vs Timothy Roberson / David Horetsky6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Hall / Andre Teixeira vs Guy REYHERME / Forwen DelaRosa6-1, 6-1
2025-05-03vs FK McClureWon 10
W#1 SinglesChaya Jollu vs Donald McWee6-2, 6-1
2025-04-21vs FK McClureWon 10
W#1 SinglesChaya Jollu vs Dwayne Molock6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Men 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Andre Teixeira
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Cuppy Steven
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Larry Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Chaya Jollu
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Jack Gandolfo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Dan Livingston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
David Lo Vece
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Dave Mathieu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patrick McManus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tyler Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andre Teixeira
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Cuppy Steven
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Larry Pennington
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Chaya Jollu
104W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jack Gandolfo
12W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dan Livingston
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
David Lo Vece
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Dave Mathieu
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Patrick McManus
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Jones
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.