Teams

GJTC RKAPPIUS

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - WS · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs GJTC CKOHLSSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesJenna Berguin / Abby Bridgett vs Laureen Cantwell / Abby Deeths7-5, 6-4
L#2 Female DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Sofia Treider vs Katie Mosher / Tessa Reimer3-6, 3-6
2022-07-11vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Erica Skillicorn vs Liz Herzog / Katie Mosher7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-27vs GJTC CKOHLSLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRachael Kappius / Abby Bridgett vs Laureen Cantwell / Sierra Segrest5-7, 3-6
2022-06-20vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Alexa Jo Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesJenna Berguin vs Sierra Segrest6-2, 7-5
W#2 Female DoublesRachael Kappius / Sofia Treider vs Abby Deeths / Tessa Reimer7-6, 6-2
2022-06-13vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesRachael Kappius / Abby Bridgett vs Sierra Segrest / Laureen Cantwell6-7, 3-6
W#1 Female SinglesJenna Berguin vs Katie Mosher6-3, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Erica Skillicorn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Erica Skillicorn vs Laureen Cantwell / Katie Mosher6-4, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesRachael Kappius / Abby Bridgett vs Abby Deeths / Tessa Reimer6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jenna Berguin
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Alexa Jo Smith
published 4
Erica Skillicorn
published 4
3.64
Rachael Kappius
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Amber Skillicorn
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 4
Abby Bridgett
published 3.5
3.14
Sofia Treider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Skillicorn + Erica Skillicorn4549% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jenna Berguin
74W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
4.00
4
Alexa Jo Smith
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Erica Skillicorn
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Rachael Kappius
68W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Amber Skillicorn
62W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Abby Bridgett
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sofia Treider
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.