Teams

MGoodrich (Carmel)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-23vs MPaterson (Springfield)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristine Wahr / Paris Loesch vs Brittany Padgett / Kimberly Fore1-6, 3-6
2024-08-26vs WLutgring (Ballantyne CC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Workman / Robin Mermans vs Irene Rapaglia / Janet Derrington6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesParis Loesch / Sheri Sayman vs Rachael Schuler / Jennifer Ison6-7, 1-6
2024-08-19vs BHart (Palisades)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobin Mermans / Amanda Nichols vs Kimberly Burkhamer / Jennifer Gluff3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Robin Mermans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Lauren Mulligan
published
3.55
Robyn Hoppe
published
3.47
Paris Loesch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kristine Wahr
published
3.32
Ani Bashian
published 3.5
3.30
Missy Goodrich
published
3.27
Tanya Willett
published
3.26
Andra Norman
published 3.5
3.11
Jenn Mattscheck
published
2.95
Toni Evans
published
2.95
Tamara Wise
published
2.90
Sheri Sayman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Mulligan + Missy Goodrich404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robin Mermans
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
Lauren Mulligan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Robyn Hoppe
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Paris Loesch
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kristine Wahr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Ani Bashian
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Missy Goodrich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Tanya Willett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andra Norman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Jenn Mattscheck
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Toni Evans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Tamara Wise
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Sheri Sayman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.