Teams

MCTL50/BreakfieldRHTC

Singles 50 & Over (Non-Advancing) · 50 & Over Men - 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-01Split 11
W#1 SinglesBrian Hartzog vs Phil Suggs6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRene Restificar vs David Richardson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Hartzog vs Robert Chittenden6-3, 6-1
2023-08-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Hartzog vs Leland Greeley6-4, 6-1
2023-08-01Split 11
W#1 SinglesBrian Hartzog vs Barry Wells6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRene Restificar vs Robert Chittenden1-6, 1-6
2023-07-25Lost 01
L#3 SinglesRene Restificar vs Bill Grove0-6, 1-6
2023-07-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Hartzog vs Leland Greeley6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 50 & Over Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Brian Hartzog
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.41
Jonathan Hurd
published
2.71
Rene Restificar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Andrew Lombardo
published
Joseph OBrien
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Hartzog
85W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
Jonathan Hurd
68W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
3
Rene Restificar
23W–91L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Andrew Lombardo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph OBrien
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.