Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-31vs KY/LOU/RILEY/COOMESLost 14
W#1 DoublesLouise Todd / Kim Johnson vs Elizabeth Austin / Carrie Ehrhard6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Lindsey Graves2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThuy Murphy / Mechelle Kaufman vs Kim Riley / Tatiane Cavallazzi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDayna Thomas vs Laura Westfaul2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Ross / Samantha Oerther vs Margi Sperry / Kathryn Barrott3-6, 4-6
2025-04-26vs KY/LOU/FRAZIER/WHITMERWon 32
W#1 DoublesTamara Duvall-McClain / Dawn McCubbin vs Erin Frazier / Jessica Whitmer6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDayna Thomas vs Meggie McMahon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThuy Murphy / Mechelle Kaufman vs Lindsay Zeller / Tracey Woock6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKaren Weathers vs Rachel Miranda6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Emma Breetz vs Kate Bailey / Holly Gravely4-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs KY/LOU/HALE/HAWKINSWon 32
W#1 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Thuy Murphy vs Kathleen Renda / Lauren Peter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Stephanie Saxton0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Karen Weathers vs Tracey Pangallo / Katherine Wilson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSamantha Oerther vs Laila Felli1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKim Johnson / Kate Hendon vs Kathie Purdie / Kate McPherson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Thuy Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Karen Weathers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Tamara Duvall-McClain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Christine Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
published 3
2.69
Emma Breetz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.66
Dawn McCubbin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Lindagarde Dalton
published
2.32
Yana Feygin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Laci Pauley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Samantha Oerther
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.22
Dayna Thomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.20
Sophia Mobley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Winkler
published
Jenna Wrinkles
published
Kate Hendon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thuy Murphy + Christine Montgomery3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Thuy Murphy + Mechelle Kaufman4457% games−6.9% vs expected
Christine Montgomery + Karen Weathers3452% games−7.8% vs expected
Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers2354% gamesnot enough data
Daryl Alfrey + Christine Montgomery044 matchesnot enough data
Thuy Murphy + Karen Weathers303 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Oerther + Sophia Mobley123 matchesnot enough data
Sophia Mobley + Emma Breetz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thuy Murphy
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Karen Weathers
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tamara Duvall-McClain
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Christine Montgomery
30W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Emma Breetz
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Dawn McCubbin
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Lindagarde Dalton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Yana Feygin
13W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Laci Pauley
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Samantha Oerther
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
3
Dayna Thomas
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.22
Sophia Mobley
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Elizabeth Winkler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Wrinkles
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Hendon
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Louise Todd
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.