Teams

Jami Sharp/JB/3Oaks

Sizzlin Summer Singles League · 3.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming
Sep 14 12:00 AM
vs Oliva Pate/JB/APCC
Three Oaks Racquet Club
Sep 21 12:00 AM
at Sarah Fowler/JB/APCC
Allen Park Community Center
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hannah Agudelo/JB/APCC404009
2Rylee Sisco/JB/APCC2121327
3Tammy Lee/JB/3Oaks000000
4Audrey Niell/JB/JCC000000
53.0W Singles000000
6Julie Rogers/JB/APCC0101212
7Jami Sharp/JB/3Oaks0202422
8Danial Reed/JB/RPCC0202425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Jami Sharp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Jami Sharp
27W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.