Teams

Bailey/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnette Crocker / Mary Smith vs Carol Jamison / Laura Newport6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson vs Linda Goodwyn / Patricia Evans4-6, 2-6
2026-04-29vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Crocker / Mary Smith vs Susan Severn / Laura Newport2-2
L#2 DoublesMary Ball / MARY SANDERS vs Carol Jamison / Ida Johnson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Simpson / Sherry Crews vs Carmen Greenberg / Patricia Evans6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Crocker / Beth Stromatt vs Carmen Greenberg / Susan Severn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson vs Linda Goodwyn / Patricia Evans4-6, 4-6
2026-04-01vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Crocker / Sherry Crews vs Patricia Evans / Frances Hogue6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ball / Beth Stromatt vs Wendy Roth / Ida Johnson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-28vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Cunningham / Mary Smith vs Carol Jamison / Ida Johnson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Brandon / MARY SANDERS vs Marcy Jacobs / Carmen Greenberg1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Stromatt / Nancy Bailey vs Patricia Evans / Wendy Roth6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Jamison/Severn/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Crocker / MARY SANDERS vs Frances Hogue / Beth Binkley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson vs Laura Newport / Susan Severn0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Bailey / Angela Brandon vs Linda Goodwyn / Kathleen Urban1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Annette Crocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angela Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Beth Stromatt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Dawn Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
MARY SANDERS
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Cindy Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Sherry Crews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Cunningham + Dawn Simpson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annette Crocker
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Angela Brandon
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Beth Stromatt
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Dawn Simpson
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
MARY SANDERS
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Cindy Cunningham
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Sherry Crews
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.