Teams

Craig/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Walsh/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesLacey Craig / Keli Brand vs Mandy Powell / Katherine Stringfellow2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Caroline Palmer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDelaney Williams / Amy Fruitt vs Lale Adams / Emily Quinn3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Worrell Sterling / Hannah Hackett vs Bailey Salmon / Emily Owen5-7, 0-6
2026-04-26vs Gronostaj/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesKeli Brand / Libby Harris vs Natalie Souder / Breeana Crouch2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Jackson / Kelly Crowe vs Amy Smythe / Jean Phebus6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Lauren Heard1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Womack / Melody Greene vs Sally Gillum / Kayleigh Mitchell0-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Pisoni/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelody Greene / Amy Fruitt vs Charlotte Gillespie / Kate Sullivan6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Tanner Baker6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Womack / Libby Harris vs Rebecca Hinds / Mary Allison Becksfort6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Crowe vs Paulina Reyes Garcia6-1, 6-2
2026-04-12vs Sentilles/MemphisWon 31
L#1 DoublesVictoria Jackson / Amy Fruitt vs Robyn Jones / Caley Spotts6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLacey Craig / Keli Brand vs Abigail Webb / Melissa Hines6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Katie Ratton6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Crowe / Gina Cox vs Katherine Sentilles / Katherine House7-5, 7-5
2026-03-31vs Moore/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesLacey Craig / Anna Witte vs Rebecca Hannaman / Makenzie Perkins6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Madeline Hirt3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHannah Hackett / Delaney Williams vs Ching Cushing-Murray / Tara Fowler2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLibby Harris vs Teri Hirt5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Fruitt / Lisa Womack vs Susan Gambrell / Addison Van Ronzelen6-2, 6-4
2026-03-22vs Walsh/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnna Witte / Keli Brand vs Emily Owen / Ellen Horn6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesVictoria Jackson vs Caroline Palmer2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Zanca / Kelly Crowe vs Sydney Tomes Steffner / Mary Wilkes Yonchak6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJACKIE DU vs Natalie McClure4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHannah Hackett / Lacey Craig vs Huxley Maury / Bailey Salmon7-6, 6-4
2026-03-08vs Gronostaj/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesLacey Craig / Kelly Crowe vs Maria Foley / Jean Phebus2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDelaney Williams / Gina Cox vs Elizabeth Bell / Sally Gillum4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesLibby Harris vs Natalie Souder2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Jackson / Amy Worrell Sterling vs Natalie McLean / Kayleigh Mitchell4-6, 3-6
2026-03-01vs Pisoni/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKeli Brand / Libby Harris vs Marjorie Porter / Rebecca Hinds6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGina Cox / Kelly Crowe vs Jennie Silk / Lauren Carr6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Worrell Sterling / Hannah Hackett vs Marianne Smith / Patricia Barker6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Victoria Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.86
Keli Brand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Amy Fruitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Kelly Crowe
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.79
Lisa Womack
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Libby Harris
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
JACKIE DU
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Lacey Craig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Delaney Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Melody Greene
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Amy Worrell Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Hannah Hackett
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Craig + Libby Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Craig + Delaney Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Jackson
19W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Keli Brand
16W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Amy Fruitt
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Kelly Crowe
29W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Lisa Womack
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Libby Harris
21W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
JACKIE DU
14W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Lacey Craig
27W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Delaney Williams
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Melody Greene
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Amy Worrell Sterling
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Hannah Hackett
11W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.