Teams

ADoi-DFC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-17vs DCorey-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Johnston / Meta Kuehn vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Cheryl Stevens4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-10vs LBaxter-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeta Kuehn / Beth Anderson vs Mindy Miller / Sarah Ederle6-2, 7-5
2025-03-27vs TBrooks-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesMeta Kuehn / Cynthia Larrick vs Traci Brooks / Angela Baxley4-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs SGraff-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeta Kuehn / Sarah Parker vs Susan Graff / Deb Lanier1-6, 5-7
2025-03-13vs KMcWhorter-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdriana Doi / Susan Alden vs Loralie Bible / Kristin Cooley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily McClernon / Stephanie Thomas vs Lindsay Mize / Judy Faubert1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-06vs KBradfield-HSWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Alden / Adriana Doi vs Mary Macdonald / Jennifer Hoffmann6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHalle Amick / Meta Kuehn vs Kristen Bradfield / Lori Sloan7-5, 7-5
2025-03-01vs KLaan-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Parker / Meta Kuehn vs Wendy Lindberg / Karli Eller1-6, 5-7
2025-02-27vs AKalinowski-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Erin Wynia1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Thomas / Emily McClernon vs Tanya Barcinas / Jennifer Straughn4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Amy Johnston
published 3.5
3.25
Susan Alden
published
3.07
Melissa Daubert
published
3.05
Halle Amick
published
3.04
Jeanne Murray
published
2.92
Adriana Doi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Emily McClernon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Meta Kuehn
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Betsy Fulcher
published 3
2.69
Cynthia Larrick
published 3
Kelli Dugan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meta Kuehn + Adriana Doi2931% games−12.6% vs expected
Jeanne Murray + Meta Kuehn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Johnston
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susan Alden
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Melissa Daubert
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Halle Amick
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jeanne Murray
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Adriana Doi
38W–89L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Emily McClernon
12W–14L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Meta Kuehn
64W–113L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Betsy Fulcher
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Cynthia Larrick
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Kelli Dugan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.