Teams

3-TBuckley-CHTC

2023 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-03vs 2-RGildehaus-HVFYMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDoug Kopec / Mark Higuchi vs Rod Boyle / David Holub6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Tudor / Gary Glish vs David Hubacher / Vincent Illiano5-7, 4-6
2023-04-26vs 4-VStiebris-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Ryan / Gary Glish vs Valdis Stiebris / Dave Thomas7-5, 6-1
2023-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDoug Kopec / Mark Higuchi vs Brian Bornstein / Robert Lacy6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-05vs 1-NBuckley-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesTimothy Buckley / Doug Kopec vs John Spurrell / David Grose3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-29vs 2-RGildehaus-HVFYMCAWon 10
W#3 DoublesDoug Kopec / Timothy Buckley vs Derek Saccoccio / Ed Holub6-2, 6-4
2023-03-22vs 4-VStiebris-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Mark Farber vs Mark Macdonald / David Stefan2-6, 3-6
2023-03-01vs 1-NBuckley-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Kopec / Mark Higuchi vs Tim McMahon / Chris Sansone4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Randy Cubrilovic
published
3.32
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.30
Doug Kopec
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Gary Glish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Timothy Buckley
published
3.18
Mark Higuchi
published
3.13
Steve Dischinger
published
3.08
Richard Goldberg
published
2.86
Robert Kern
published
Mark Thomsen
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Kopec + Gary Glish18662% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randy Cubrilovic
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Dan Tudor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Doug Kopec
82W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Gary Glish
140W–124L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Timothy Buckley
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Mark Higuchi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Steve Dischinger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Richard Goldberg
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Robert Kern
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.86
Mark Thomsen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.