Teams

Detonators-Billups

2025 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs Battlefield Ballbusters-ButtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Robinson / Maurice Cornejo vs Dalyah Ronzio / Ben Jorgensen6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamie Stokes / Tim Drake vs Tara Ford / Alex Angiolillo6-3, 7-5
2025-02-20vs TNT-NankivelLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaurice Cornejo / Leslie Caliri vs Curtis Harris / Lucie Tuthill3-6, 4-6
2025-02-01vs TNT-NankivelWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Franklin / David Sharon vs Luis Aragon / Keyona Bell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Brown / Cynthia Robinson vs Tang Subkanha / Erika Subkanha6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNazarina Phommachanh / Maurice Cornejo vs Rikki Reynolds / Rachael Day6-4, 7-6
2025-01-28vs Smart Aces 7.0-PenningsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaurice Cornejo / Leslie Caliri vs Marla Aste / Alex Noi6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Shadab Khan
published
3.59
David Sharon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Maurice Cornejo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Leslie Caliri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jamie Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Cynthia Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Megan Roberge
published
2.90
Linda Blakemore
published
2.80
Karen Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nazarina Phommachanh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trent Billups
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shadab Khan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
David Sharon
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Maurice Cornejo
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Leslie Caliri
51W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Robinson
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Megan Roberge
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
Linda Blakemore
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Karen Franklin
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Nazarina Phommachanh
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tim Drake
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Trent Billups
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.