Teams

NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesBruno Luiz Ley Santos / Matthew Core vs Cedric Barringer / Pat Cunneen6-0, 6-1
2023-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Core / Pete Olson vs Stewart Mitchell / Joe Hart6-1, 7-5
2023-04-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Core vs Stewart Mitchell3-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs LAGUNITAS CC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Core / Erik Sherley vs Richard Roberts / Courtney OConnell7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Matthew Core
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Gustavo Evangelista
published 3.5
3.45
Gan Tam
published 3.5
3.42
Brian Kaplan
published 3.5
3.42
3.41
3.34
Chris Moffatt
published 3.5
3.34
Tim Meksavanh
published
3.30
3.25
Hamid Karimiyanha
published 3.5
Erik Sherley
published 3.5
Mark Grimshaw
published
Michael Pitre
published
Robildo Diaz
published
Scott Griffiths
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Meksavanh + Bruno Luiz Ley Santos3250% games−4.5% vs expected
Somasekar Srinivasan + Subramanian Rajagopalan224 matchesnot enough data
Somasekar Srinivasan + Gan Tam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Matthew Core
122W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Gustavo Evangelista
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Gan Tam
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Brian Kaplan
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Somasekar Srinivasan
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Bruno Luiz Ley Santos
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Chris Moffatt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Tim Meksavanh
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Subramanian Rajagopalan
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Hamid Karimiyanha
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Erik Sherley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Grimshaw
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Pitre
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robildo Diaz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Griffiths
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.