Teams

Schroeder/55/6.5/CM/CCLA

2026 BR Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (55&O) Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 13 2:00 PM
The Country Club of Louisiana
Sep 20 2:00 PM
The Legacy @ Bonne Esperance
Sep 27 2:00 PM
The Country Club of Louisiana
Oct 4 2:00 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Oct 11 2:00 PM
vs N/A
Alan SchroederSteve Moore
2026-08-30vs Braud/55/6.5/CM/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Piland / Steve Caruso vs Andrew Beadle / Christopher Caruso5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKip Smith / Alan Schroeder vs Burk Heroman / Stewart Guerin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteve Moore / Chip Lambert vs Barry Eggie / David Lindsey6-1, 7-5
2026-08-16vs Schultz/55/6.5/CM/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesRusty Jenkins / Scott Ginn vs Keith Schultz / Richard Miller6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSteve Caruso / Jay Piland vs Ed Anderson / Benny Lenox6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKip Smith / Alan Schroeder vs Jaime Nevarez / Mark Mains6-1, 6-1
2026-08-09vs Ligh/55/6.5/CM/LegWon 21
W#1 DoublesKip Smith / Alan Schroeder vs Curren Pitre / Thomas Indest7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Favaro / Chip Lambert vs Jody Capello / John So6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRusty Jenkins / Hank Chiles vs Thomas Wafer / Mike Guerin2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs Goings/55/6.5/CM/BocWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteve Caruso / Jay Piland vs Billy Ridge / Hunter Greene6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Mouton / Chip Lambert vs Stewart Gordon / Michael Fels7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Ginn / Kevin Dibenedetto vs Stephen St Cyr / Mark Schexnayder6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 BR (55&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schroeder/55/6.5/CM/CCLA3081251
2Goings/55/6.5/CM/Boc1133862
3Braud/55/6.5/CM/SOAC1124859
4Ligh/55/6.5/CM/Leg12451285
5Schultz/55/6.5/CM/SOAC02151169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Rusty Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Kevin Dibenedetto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lawrence Gettys
published
3.25
Keith Favaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Jay Piland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Steve Caruso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Kip Smith
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
David Mathies
published 3.5
3.08
Rob Dille
published
2.99
Steve Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Mark Folse
published
2.90
Chip Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Scott Ginn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Benjamin Mouton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Hank Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Alan Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Schroeder + Kip Smith6260% games+18.7% vs expected
Steve Caruso + Jay Piland16264% games+5.9% vs expected
Benjamin Mouton + Kip Smith2344% games+5.3% vs expected
David Mathies + Rusty Jenkins2443% games+3.9% vs expected
Kevin Dibenedetto + Keith Favaro0527% gamesnot enough data
Benjamin Mouton + Chip Lambert224 matchesnot enough data
Steve Moore + Chip Lambert213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Folse + Alan Schroeder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rusty Jenkins
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Kevin Dibenedetto
19W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Lawrence Gettys
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Keith Favaro
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
Jay Piland
65W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Steve Caruso
56W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Kip Smith
36W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
David Mathies
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Rob Dille
15W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Steve Moore
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Mark Folse
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Chip Lambert
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Scott Ginn
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Benjamin Mouton
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Hank Chiles
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Alan Schroeder
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.