Teams

HERM-Hardesty

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-26vs ACAC-StephensWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Jon Nystrom vs Lara Hansen / Scott Oakley6-3, 6-4
2023-03-18vs WW-SeredniLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / John Gardner vs Peyton Bowman / Bobbie Lou Oley1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-11vs SAL-LaneWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Jon Nystrom vs Karen Franks / Kyle Fondren6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-28vs BURK-ColginLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristy Bauer / Brian Betz vs Tyler Sinsabaugh / Priscilla Woody0-6, 4-6
2023-01-15vs ACAC-WilsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelby Morgan / AMY LINES vs Jeffrey Foddrell / Yasmin Lutterbie7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-08vs ACAC-HatcherWon 10
W#1 DoublesDennis Dodson / AMY LINES vs Ken Hatcher / Elena Carter6-0, 6-1
2023-01-07vs WW-RacelisLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Betz / Kristy Bauer vs Wes Valentine / SanDee Gammon4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kristy Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
3.27
Susan Poulos
published
3.26
Virginia Berents
published
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
3.07
Sharon Mugford
published
2.79
Elizabeth Betz
published
Brian Betz
published 3
Krysten Bishop
published
Mark Westman
published
Susan Mangin
published
Tissa Nasta
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Kristy Bauer
57W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Susan Poulos
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Virginia Berents
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Sharon Mugford
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Elizabeth Betz
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brian Betz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Westman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tissa Nasta
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.