Teams

Wilkinson

2025 Roanoke Adult 18 & Over · Roanoke Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-11vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHolly Hamlin / Shari Coolbaugh vs Bonnie Reedy / Young Ju2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Liz Mason-Deese6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Wilkinson / Laura Capuano vs Nancy Via / Laura Quesenberry1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie McMichael / Kirsten McGhee vs Anne Jones / Harper Minarik3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Cullen / Holly Hamlin vs Young Ju / Liz Mason-Deese2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Nancy Via6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKirsten McGhee / Carol Fitch vs Lois Harris / Tiffany LaCroix3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-09vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Kiser / Holly Hamlin vs Young Ju / Laura Quesenberry3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Cullen / Whittney Dunkenberger vs Anne Jones / Lois Harris6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKirsten McGhee / Julie McMichael vs Bonnie Reedy / Lynne Krulich4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-05vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sLost 13
W#1 DoublesAmy Cullen / Whittney Dunkenberger vs Liz Mason-Deese / Laura Quesenberry7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJulie McMichael vs Harper Minarik0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Hamlin / Carolyn Kiser vs Young Ju / Anne Jones3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShari Coolbaugh / Kirsten McGhee vs Lynne Krulich / Tiffany LaCroix6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-28vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWhittney Dunkenberger / Kathleen Allen vs Nancy Via / Tiffany LaCroix6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJulie McMichael vs Harper Minarik1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Cullen / Holly Hamlin vs Liz Mason-Deese / Bonnie Reedy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Kiser / Kirsten McGhee vs Young Ju / Laura Quesenberry1-6, 4-6
2025-04-21vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sWon 21
L#1 SinglesHolly Hamlin vs Harper Minarik2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Allen / Whittney Dunkenberger vs Liz Mason-Deese / Laura Quesenberry6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Fitch / Kirsten McGhee vs Young Ju / Anne Jones5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLaura Capuano / Holly Hamlin vs Liz Mason-Deese / Laura Quesenberry7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMolly McMichael vs Nancy Via2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Cullen / Nancy Wilkinson vs Tiffany LaCroix / Bonnie Reedy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Kiser / Kirsten McGhee vs Young Ju / Lois Harris4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-07vs Mason-Deese - BB4.5sSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Perez / Whittney Dunkenberger vs Young Ju / Laura Quesenberry6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Cullen vs Liz Mason-Deese1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Kiser / Holly Hamlin vs Bonnie Reedy / Nancy Via6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Wilkinson / Kirsten McGhee vs Harper Minarik / Lois Harris6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Roanoke Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Whittney Dunkenberger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.27
Carolyn Kiser
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.19
Laura Capuano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Holly Hamlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.80
Carol Fitch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kirsten McGhee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Julie McMichael
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Shari Coolbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Molly McMichael
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Amy Cullen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Fitch + Kirsten McGhee5256% games+9.6% vs expected
Holly Hamlin + Carolyn Kiser4352% games−11.0% vs expected
Whittney Dunkenberger + Amy Cullen303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cullen + Holly Hamlin123 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Kiser + Kirsten McGhee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whittney Dunkenberger
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Carolyn Kiser
15W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Laura Capuano
142W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Holly Hamlin
18W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Carol Fitch
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kirsten McGhee
17W–13L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Julie McMichael
18W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Shari Coolbaugh
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Molly McMichael
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4.5
Amy Cullen
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.