Teams

DB - Fox

2023 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.28 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Howell / DALTON IEIRI vs Kelsy Hill / Brian Oen6-3, 6-0
2023-02-19vs BCHZ - ParkLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Edelstein / Tara Edelstein vs Stefan Gerber / Terry Rodriguez3-6, 3-6
2023-02-09vs Alachua/Zaldivar/40&Over6.0XDLost 01
L#2 DoublesDanielle McGriff / DALTON IEIRI vs Jerome Valencia / Julia Morrisroe7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-02-02vs WS - FergusonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDALTON IEIRI / Cynthia Lewis vs Angie Gomez / Rick Carlson6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTara Edelstein / Bryan Edelstein vs Nathan Whitaker / Faun Carlson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-26vs HCC - Hill/TangemanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHebah Fox / DALTON IEIRI vs Kelsy Hill / Christopher Silver6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cassisi / Thomas Yonge vs Jodi Cox / Joseph Cox IV4-6, 1-6
2023-01-19vs WS - FergusonLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Howell / DALTON IEIRI vs Anita Rajasekhar / Nathan Whitaker6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanielle McGriff / Bobby Desai vs MARY K WIMSETT / Brent Sumerlin3-6, 3-6
2023-01-14vs BCHZ - ParkWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Yonge / Cassie Johnson vs Benjamin Bensadon / Yolanda Mama6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Tara Edelstein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.57
Lauren Indelicato
published
3.44
DALTON IEIRI
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Thomas Yonge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Howell
published 3.5
3.19
Hebah Fox
published 3.5
3.14
Cynthia Lewis
published 3.5
3.11
Kelly Haager
published
2.97
Dieter Haager
published 3
2.97
Cassie Johnson
published 3
JASON BROMIRSKI
published 3
2.68
Danielle McGriff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Edelstein
88W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Lauren Indelicato
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
DALTON IEIRI
134W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Thomas Yonge
149W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Elizabeth Howell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Hebah Fox
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kelly Haager
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Dieter Haager
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Cassie Johnson
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
JASON BROMIRSKI
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Danielle McGriff
72W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.