Teams

Terral/55/6.5/CWD/BREC

2025 BR Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 BR (55&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-26vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Matherne / Mary Santoro vs Patti Carter / Alena Prejean7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCynthia Chustz / Carrie Bourgeois vs Allison Sanchez / Carole Wilkins6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudith Niland / Kay Lambert vs Shona McCoy / Michele Mclindon7-5, 7-6
2025-09-05vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn David / Mary Kay Devillier vs Michele Mclindon / Julienne Waguespack2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Matherne / Rachel Cherco vs Julie Smith / Katherine Overland7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGeorgette Fontenot / Kay Lambert vs Angela DeJean / Shona McCoy6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-08vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Cherco / Mary Kay Devillier vs Julie Smith / Katherine Overland2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKay Lambert / Georgette Fontenot vs Angela DeJean / MaryClaire Hotard2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Bogan / Michelle Matherne vs Patti Carter / Allison Sanchez5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 BR (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Michelle Quinn
published
3.28
Michelle Matherne
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Georgette Fontenot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Cynthia Chustz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Carrie Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Mary Santoro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Mary Kay Devillier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Rachel Cherco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Cinda Terral
published 3
2.65
Kay Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Marsha Jabour
published
2.54
Carol Bogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Susan Tucker
published
Judith Niland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn David
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Quinn
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Michelle Matherne
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Georgette Fontenot
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Chustz
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Carrie Bourgeois
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Mary Santoro
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mary Kay Devillier
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
Rachel Cherco
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Cinda Terral
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kay Lambert
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Marsha Jabour
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Carol Bogan
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Susan Tucker
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Judith Niland
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lynn David
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.