Teams

VTC-Locke/Anderson

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Deborah Self
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.74
Tina Kriebaum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results5 ties
2023-11-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Escamilla / Deborah Self vs Linda Engelsiepen / Patricia Kuchar6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Kriebaum / Melany Lawson vs Susan Fowler / Beverly Reed6-1, 6-4
2023-11-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Locke / Deborah Self vs Yu Zhang / Catherine Huang7-5, 6-2
2023-11-04Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristy Locke / Deborah Self vs Karla Hendrickson / Victoria Cartwright6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTina Kriebaum / Anne Walsh vs Christina Hancock / Carmen Timberlake6-2, 7-6
2023-10-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Escamilla / Tina Kriebaum vs Jean Jensen / Julie Nichols6-1, 6-4
2023-09-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Escamilla - * / Deborah Self vs Tamara Phillips / Margaret Huck6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3
Tina Kriebaum
32W–58L career
2%98%1%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.