Teams

Club Fit Briarcliff: Commanders

2024 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesLane Bonadies / Jeanette Kim vs Chris Foster / Ann Thomas4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDina Katz / Roy Behren vs Akbar Hussain / Katrina Pape4-6, 1-6
2024-01-07vs WTC: NY 7.0 Mix 18+ TrickstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Olney / Stuart Kuritzky vs David Antenucci / Kathryn Mae Alandy0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Behren / Roy Behren vs Joanna Venar / Hector Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Marucci / Michael Venuti vs Luis Alandy / Christine Rizk0-6, 2-6
2023-12-17vs Saw Mill SlicersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexis Dorst / Michael Coelho vs Natasha Sauerborn / Faris Khader2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Olney / Vincente Quiao vs Randa Sauerborn / Steven Lau6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesToby Amidor / Jiarui Wang vs Michael Garris / Jessica Cambareri6-4, 6-4
2023-12-03vs WTC: NY 7.0 18+ Guys & DollsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRavilochan Pola / Christine Marucci vs Hillary Portnoy / Greg Portnoy6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJiarui Wang / Toby Amidor vs Sandra Wilson / Gordon Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Behren / Roy Behren vs Marlena Simmons / Jorge Linero4-6, 3-6
2023-11-19vs Armonk Tennis Club - JimenezWon 21
L#1 DoublesLane Bonadies / Alyson Vanross vs Richard Long / Grissel Weseman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Green / Dina Katz vs Adriana Galli / Thom Russo6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Olney / Vincente Quiao vs Sandra Soto / Christopher Wood6-0, 6-0
2023-11-05vs LIFETIME ATHLETIC: Grip n RipWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Moore / Matt Green vs Glen Sansone / Ellen Dumark6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLane Bonadies / Christine Marucci vs George Kuo / Christina Tan6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlexis Dorst / Michael Coelho vs Dan James / Annette James6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-22vs Tennis Club of HastingsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLane Bonadies / Brenda Timm vs Steven Aveni / Robin Muskin7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPaul Poole / Nurit Praeger vs Jay Lee / Frida Matute4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Olney / Vincente Quiao vs Stuart Jakub / Amanda Fialk1-6, 3-6
2023-10-15vs CRRC: No Strings AttachedLost 12
L#1 DoublesHana Chalupkova / Michael Coelho vs Mario Valadez Trevino / Christine Casey-Charter2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDina Katz / Matt Green vs Tracy Jones-Henry / Scott Hodgson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Shelton / Zicheng Zhang vs Jennifer Shim / Tom Tierney3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC: NY 7.0 Mix 18+ Tricksters0819511148
2WTC: Mixed Nuts0817716182
3MTDZ: United0817719192
4Sportime Lake Isle: Shore Swingers08141026232
5CRRC: Highly Strung08121126214
6Westchester Ave Tennis: Royals08111329222
7WTC: NY 7.0 18+ Guys & Dolls08101432231
8Club Fit Briarcliff: Commanders0881635240
9LIFETIME ATHLETIC: Grip n Rip0881535240
10Saw Mill Slicers0871635235
11RRC: Rye Rack-it Up0851938253
12WTC: Doubles Troubles0842042271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lane Bonadies
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Alexis Dorst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Ravilochan Pola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Hana Chalupkova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Nurit Praeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Christine Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jiarui Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Brenda Timm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Toby Amidor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Joan Behren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Jeanette Kim
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Dina Katz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Christine Marucci
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Lisa Olney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Jane Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alyson Vanross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Michael Venuti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Michael Coelho
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Poole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roy Behren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stuart Kuritzky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vincente Quiao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Zicheng Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lane Bonadies + Lisa Olney3354% games+8.3% vs expected
Jeanette Kim + Ravilochan Pola7256% games+5.0% vs expected
Lane Bonadies + Jeanette Kim5256% games+3.2% vs expected
Roy Behren + Joan Behren3943% gamesnot enough data
Vincente Quiao + Lisa Olney3352% gamesnot enough data
Dina Katz + Lane Bonadies2346% gamesnot enough data
Alyson Vanross + Jiarui Wang134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Shelton + Stuart Kuritzky134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Bonadies
61W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Alexis Dorst
23W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Ravilochan Pola
21W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Hana Chalupkova
36W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
Nurit Praeger
50W–89L career · 1 line in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Christine Moore
158W–152L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jiarui Wang
70W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Brenda Timm
47W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Toby Amidor
78W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Joan Behren
99W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Jeanette Kim
134W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Dina Katz
50W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.91
3.5
Christine Marucci
84W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.91
Lisa Olney
131W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jane Shelton
21W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Alyson Vanross
82W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Michael Venuti
28W–17L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Coelho
16W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Poole
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Roy Behren
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stuart Kuritzky
24W–45L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Vincente Quiao
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zicheng Zhang
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.