Teams

Le Baller

2025 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-03-28vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLei He / Jim Hannan vs Parmvir Singh / Clinton Parks2-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs DefendersWon 10
W#3 DoublesPAUL BAIK / Jie Wang vs Tim Munshell / Walid Bannoura6-4, 6-4
2025-03-11vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPAUL BAIK / Jie Wang vs Ben Lazarus / Kenny Handwerger2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-09vs DefendersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesQiming He / PAUL BAIK vs Richard McKeon / Alexandre Fines4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJay Colella / Jim Hannan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-25vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesQiming He / PAUL BAIK vs Clinton Parks / Kenny Handwerger6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs DefendersLost 01
L#3 DoublesQiming He / PAUL BAIK vs Bahaa Ghammraoui / Majed Hamawy3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-15vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPAUL BAIK / Lei He vs Bryan Bassig / Clinton Parks1-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs DefendersWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Wang / PAUL BAIK vs Bahaa Ghammraoui / Richard McKeon6-4, 6-4
2025-02-01vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPAUL BAIK / Chung-Kai Hsiao vs Ivan Kozliak / Kenny Handwerger4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJim Hannan / Qiming He vs Mario Olivero-Cabrera / Tim McNamara1-6, 0-6
2025-01-30vs DefendersWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Wang / Jim Hannan vs Chungchi Yao / Raymond Barry6-2, 7-6
2025-01-15vs TennisFun 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChung-Kai Hsiao / Jim Hannan vs Ivan Kozliak / Kenny Handwerger0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jie Wang
published
Chung-Kai Hsiao
published 3.5
3.15
PAUL BAIK
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
Jay Colella
published
3.07
Qiming He
published
3.05
Jim Hannan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Jim Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Colella + Qiming He224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jie Wang
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Chung-Kai Hsiao
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
PAUL BAIK
95W–75L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jay Colella
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Qiming He
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Jim Hannan
133W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Jim Zhang
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.