Teams

RKaracaova (Raintree)

2026 Singles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Thurs PM

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-30vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Won 20
W#2 SinglesKate Loor vs Lisa Morgan6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMalu Tan vs Katie Kuehner6-2, 6-1
2026-07-14vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 SinglesKate Loor vs Zahide Marenic4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Katie Kuehner6-1, 6-2
2026-07-02vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesSusan Staley vs Peggy Reimann2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMalu Tan vs Zahide Marenic3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Kate MacRone7-5, 6-4
2026-06-26vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDonna Callinan vs Rhonda Tate1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMalu Tan vs Kim Gissy0-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKate Loor vs Rhonda Tate4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Kimberley Pennington1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMalu Tan vs Kate MacRone3-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 SinglesSusan Staley vs Rhonda Tate3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKate Loor vs Lisa Morgan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-04vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Peggy Reimann7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKate Loor vs Kate MacRone6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-28vs KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesKate Loor vs Kimberley Pennington3-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMalu Tan vs Lisa Morgan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KMacrone/KKuehner (Park Road)8121615173
2RKaracaova (Raintree)1862144287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Kate Loor
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.93
Rona Karacaova
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.89
Susan Staley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.77
Malu Tan
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.50
Donna Callinan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rona Karacaova + Donna Callinan4261% games+15.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kate Loor
49W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Rona Karacaova
50W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Susan Staley
107W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Malu Tan
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Donna Callinan
46W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.