Teams

STL-REG-Spencer/18&Over4.5W

18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, & 4.5 Section Championships · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Norman/18&Over4.5W000000
2IA-REG-Morrissey-Hill-Matthes/18&Over4.5W000000
3NE-REG-Smith/Obear/18&Over4.5W000000
4STL-REG-Spencer/18&Over4.5W000000
5OK-REG-Sandvig000000
6KS-REG-Osborne/18&Over4.5W000000
7STLWC-Peterson/Huchet/18&Over4.5W000000
8HOA-WC-Schick/18&Over4.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison Cox
published 4.5
4.12
Trinity Lopez
published
4.08
Emily Cimarolli
published
4.05
Victoria Zielinski
published
3.98
Caitlin Winey
published 4.5
3.98
Cheryl Perlmutter
published 4.5
3.97
Miranda Lopez
published
3.83
Elizabeth Chiapelas
published
3.79
Antoinette Kovar
published 4.5
3.78
Elizabeth Spencer
published
Leticia Lunge
published
Lori Brewer
published
Shae Calcari
published
Sonia Patel
published
Whitney Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Patel + Elizabeth Chiapelas7561% games+24.0% vs expected
Sonia Patel + Trinity Lopez8167% games+18.8% vs expected
Sonia Patel + Whitney Smith8166% games+17.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Chiapelas + Victoria Zielinski6158% games+13.8% vs expected
Miranda Lopez + Antoinette Kovar14458% games+12.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Chiapelas + Caitlin Winey4261% games+11.9% vs expected
Miranda Lopez + Trinity Lopez24663% games+11.2% vs expected
Miranda Lopez + Elizabeth Chiapelas10357% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alison Cox
40W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trinity Lopez
162W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Emily Cimarolli
115W–59L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
4.08
Victoria Zielinski
124W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
4.5
Caitlin Winey
62W–36L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Cheryl Perlmutter
56W–69L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Miranda Lopez
131W–68L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Elizabeth Chiapelas
80W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.83
4.5
Antoinette Kovar
77W–69L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.79
Elizabeth Spencer
149W–79L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Leticia Lunge
24W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Brewer
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shae Calcari
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sonia Patel
67W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Smith
39W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.