Teams

Br.Robinson18C2.5

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-23vs Mi.Vanstory18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Sweet / Mary Lewis James vs Katie Landi / Caryn McNeill6-2, 6-3
2024-09-22vs Me.Dougher18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzy Blackwell / Mary Lewis James vs Katherine Carver / Elizabeth Fogleman3-6, 2-6
2024-09-09vs Te.Canterbury18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuzy Blackwell / Brittany Robinson vs Courtney Phillips / Olivia Hollingsworth1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Sweet / Marilyn Gordian vs Lauren Gentile / Kyle Lubrano6-4, 6-3
2024-09-02vs Sp.Menzel18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Gordian / Mary Lewis James vs Spencer Busby / Mary Elizabeth Miller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Jenny Sweet vs Asa Burnham / Lauren Young4-6, 5-7
2024-08-25vs Me.Dougher18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Mary Lewis James vs Melissa Dougher / Elizabeth Adams5-7, 5-7
2024-08-19vs Sa.Fitzpatrick18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexa Spain / Mary Lewis James vs Beth Pegram / Shannon Vinson6-2, 6-2
2024-08-12vs Sa.Forman18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Lewis James / Suzy Blackwell vs Callan Fike / Kalli Unthank6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Gordian / Brittany Robinson vs Molly Lewis / Sarah Forman7-5, 6-3
2024-08-05vs Mi.Vanstory18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Marilyn Gordian vs Greyson McGrail / Elizabeth Robinson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Marilyn Gordian
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.52
Mary Lewis James
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Eva Stancil
published
2.20
Jenny Sweet
published
2.11
Brittany Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.05
Laura Yates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Lewis James + Marilyn Gordian4256% games+18.0% vs expected
Brittany Robinson + Mary Lewis James2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marilyn Gordian
80W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Mary Lewis James
80W–121L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%44%56%
2.52
Eva Stancil
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29
Jenny Sweet
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Brittany Robinson
78W–98L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Laura Yates
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.