Teams

NetSuccess 3.0M Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Patrick Hughes6-2, 6-0
2023-10-21vs The Unaided Movers 3.0M SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Colin Lippy2-6, 2-6
2023-10-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesJohn Batu vs Nyema Morais6-1, 6-0
2023-10-12vs One Hit Wonders 3.0M SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs John Fairbrother1-6, 2-6
2023-10-02vs I'd Hit That 3.0M SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Tim McNamara1-6, 3-6
2023-09-17vs Net Ninjas 3.0M SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Ateeq Ahmed2-6, 3-6
2023-09-11vs HoKor Hotshots 3.0M SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesJohn Batu vs Sung Hwan Yoon6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
John Batu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
3.09
UMA SRIKUMARAN
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.02
David Djajaputra
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.02
Richard Brandt
published
2.98
Haomin Gu
published 3
2.87
Eduardo Castillo
published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
published
2.84
Faisal Hussain
published 3
2.80
Ed Fletcher
published 3
2.75
Dean Griffith
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Djajaputra + Jose Toro5258% games+5.0% vs expected
David Djajaputra + UMA SRIKUMARAN2449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Batu
115W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
Mehdy Sedaghat Payam
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
UMA SRIKUMARAN
53W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
David Djajaputra
139W–206L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Richard Brandt
20W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Haomin Gu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Eduardo Castillo
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Jose Toro
31W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Faisal Hussain
18W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Ed Fletcher
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Dean Griffith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.