Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Allen

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 4.5M

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesChris Allen / Marshall Hoel vs Jacob Clark / Ryne Fertitta4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesIrving Stone vs JJ Harrison6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Sears / Timothy Smith vs John Collins / Robert Stoner6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesTakayuki Suzuki / Matthew Jensen vs Jonathan Brown / Rodney Horton4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Smith / Tim Sears vs Jon Penman / Aaron Gabbart6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2021-09-18vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Bublik/TotlandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTimothy Smith / Takayuki Suzuki vs David Hopkins / John Collins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesQuinn Pritchett vs Dustin Fisher6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesQuinn Pritchett / Matthew Jensen vs Fred Heath / Jeremy Harman3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChris Allen / Irving Stone vs Jon Penman / Kris Rosander2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-08-28vs Sports Mall-AllredWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarshall Hoel / Matthew Jensen vs Jory Allred / Shawn Hancock4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesQuinn Pritchett vs Steve Albert6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Allen / Irving Stone vs Alex Dalpe / Matthew Nicholaou6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CMTA @ Liberty Park-Penman/Rosander5115311143
2CMTA @ Liberty Park-Allen326920129
3CMTA @ Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland134819127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Irving Stone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Tim Sears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Quinn Pritchett
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Takayuki Suzuki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marshall Hoel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marshall Hoel + Matthew Jensen17556% games+7.8% vs expected
Quinn Pritchett + Matthew Jensen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Irving Stone
30W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.51
Tim Sears
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Quinn Pritchett
23W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
4.04
Takayuki Suzuki
19W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
Marshall Hoel
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Jensen
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.