Teams

Innisbrook Net Majesties

2025 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 W Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.06 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-13vs Heritage Springs KelseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Rutkowski / Dana Galbraith vs Terry Kelsey / Lisa DeGoes3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Goodman / Geraldine Liquidano vs Patricia Calhoun / Martha Chapman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCassandra Pauley / Debra Lombardozzi vs Jani Parrish / Patricia Smith1-6, 0-6
2025-11-15vs McMullen PronatorsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Francis / Julie Kalter vs Meriam Lummis / Deepa Rice2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCassandra Pauley / Geraldine Liquidano vs Carol Melber / Laura Baker3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDarienne Hidalgo / Caron Hobson vs Maria Calderon / Gladys Nunamaker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-08vs Pinellas/Weible/50&Over6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMona Patel / Michele Sullivan vs Rachel McCaskill / Maresol Wehner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Galbraith / Betsy Rutkowski vs Lisa Lowe / Frances Skinner5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCaron Hobson / Anne Goodman vs Barbera Loy / MICHELLE MARCATOS0-6, 4-6
2025-11-01vs Heritage Springs KelseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Francis / Julie Kalter vs Pamela Cotillo / Patricia Calhoun4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Galbraith / Betsy Rutkowski vs Gail Eberhardt / Catherine Mueller4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Liquidano / Janice Graham vs Susan Weissler / Michele Weinstock2-6, 0-6
2025-10-11vs McMullen PronatorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Betsy Rutkowski vs Carol Melber / Laura Baker7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDarienne Hidalgo / Caron Hobson vs Maria Calderon / Nancy Baron6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeverly Encarnacion / Susan Kalb vs Gladys Nunamaker / Svetlana Bondareva7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Mona Patel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Sue Francis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Caron Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Amie Rotz
published 3
2.77
Dana Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Julie Kalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Betsy Rutkowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Michele Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Anne Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Beverly Encarnacion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Darienne Hidalgo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Cassandra Pauley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Janice Graham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Debra Lombardozzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Geraldine Liquidano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Kalb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kalter + Anne Goodman4155% games+9.1% vs expected
Dana Galbraith + Betsy Rutkowski0633% gamesnot enough data
Michele Sullivan + Betsy Rutkowski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mona Patel
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Caron Hobson
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Amie Rotz
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Dana Galbraith
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Julie Kalter
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Betsy Rutkowski
4W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Michele Sullivan
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Anne Goodman
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Beverly Encarnacion
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Darienne Hidalgo
8W–19L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Cassandra Pauley
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Janice Graham
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Debra Lombardozzi
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Geraldine Liquidano
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Kalb
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.