Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/8.0/Friedl/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Hope Perez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
4.37
Courteney Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4.5
4.01
Claudia Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.52
Erica McFarland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Darren James
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.35
Hilda Finn
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 3.5
Jared Nieman
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jesus Monarrez
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Juliet Welsh
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Marcelle Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
MarieJosee Lefebvre
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Mauricio de Regules
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Olivier Blanchet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Paula Prado
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Susana Elias
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
TJ Karam
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MarieJosee Lefebvre + Susana Elias6460% games+3.6% vs expected
Hope Perez + MarieJosee Lefebvre121150% games+2.4% vs expected
Paula Prado + Claudia Calderon1543% gamesnot enough data
Susana Elias + Claudia Calderon2350% gamesnot enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre + Olivier Blanchet134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hope Perez
43W–44L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Courteney Park
71W–21L career · 22 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Claudia Calderon
41W–57L career · 28 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
3.5
Erica McFarland
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Darren James
56W–48L career · 30 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Hilda Finn
83W–95L career · 31 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jared Nieman
17W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jesus Monarrez
30W–35L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juliet Welsh
38W–17L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcelle Fernandez
24W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–110L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre
103W–76L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mauricio de Regules
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Olivier Blanchet
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susana Elias
109W–66L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Karam
79W–47L career · 43 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.