Teams

RRTC RED

2025 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-18vs HG GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Behm / Michelle McDonald vs Katie Benson / Heidi Custer6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYujeong Choi / Jennifer Lord vs Lisa McCausland / Leslie Clay6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-11vs LTFC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle McDonald / Lauren Behm vs Elizabeth Stemper / Caren Swan7-6, 6-4
2025-06-04vs VCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesYujeong Choi / Lauren Behm vs Jill Savela / Amy Bergan6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHelena Huckabee / Chloe Sobczak vs Erika Rippee / Kim Brogus3-6, 4-6
2025-05-28vs PRKR REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelena Huckabee / Yujeong Choi vs Gelsey Azhderian / Robin Mortenson3-6, 4-6
2025-05-21vs PRC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYujeong Choi / Lauren Behm vs Amber Harris / Lori Lee3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Hines / Helena Huckabee vs Celeste Gardner / Janice Nelson3-6, 2-6
2025-05-16vs SS-LT GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesYujeong Choi / Lisa Rowe vs Chris Patterson / Winddee Stallings1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Lauren Behm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Yujeong Choi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Michelle McDonald
published
Chloe Sobczak
published 3
2.65
Helena Huckabee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Beth Hines
published 2.5
Dee Hutchison
published 2.5
2.20
Lisa Rowe
published
2.13
Priscilla Hawkinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Hawkinson + Beth Hines224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle McDonald + Helena Huckabee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Behm
109W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3
Yujeong Choi
49W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Michelle McDonald
39W–30L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Chloe Sobczak
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Helena Huckabee
17W–29L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Beth Hines
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Dee Hutchison
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Rowe
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Priscilla Hawkinson
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.