Teams

GEPTA/40&overMX/4.0/Bordier/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Alejandro Bustos
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 4
3.76
Austin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.69
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
Erika Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Erika Licon
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Gibran Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Jesus Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Juliet Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Linda Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Melissa Dore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Rene Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Shannon Thomson
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+11.1% vs expected
Melissa Dore + Juliet Mattingly18465% games+9.8% vs expected
Linda Nassar + Juliet Mattingly15855% games+9.7% vs expected
Rene Herrera + Austin Allen28560% gamesnot enough data
Zulem Bordier + Michael Kotowski3354% gamesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Erika Delgado3259% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Dore + Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca2347% gamesnot enough data
Jesus Martinez + Michael Kotowski2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandro Bustos
21W–10L career · 23 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Austin Allen
152W–47L career · 28 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
48W–26L career · 14 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erika Licon
75W–59L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gibran Olmos
16W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesus Martinez
61W–33L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–38L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juliet Mattingly
89W–58L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Nassar
60W–38L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
44W–34L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Dore
107W–93L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
125W–48L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Herrera
49W–19L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Thomson
64W–53L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.