Teams

Abhold Team

2022 WI Other · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 8.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-12-04vs Toboyek TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesMicky Abhold / Ken Redman vs Todd Hammond / Patty Fronberry4-8
L#2 DoublesMarina Melberg / Michael Finnegan vs David Gahagan / Charlotte Toboyek5-8
L#3 DoublesCandace Walz / Michael Tobin vs John Park / Sarah Hardacre2-8
2022-12-04vs Toboyek TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarina Melberg / Michael Finnegan vs Sarah Hardacre / David Gahagan3-8
L#2 DoublesMicky Abhold / Ken Redman vs Patty Fronberry / John Park4-8
L#3 DoublesCandace Walz / Michael Tobin vs Charlotte Toboyek / Todd Hammond5-8
2022-12-04vs Toboyek TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesMicky Abhold / Michael Finnegan vs Charlotte Toboyek / John Park4-8
L#2 DoublesMarina Melberg / Ken Redman vs Sarah Hardacre / Todd Hammond2-8
L#3 DoublesCandace Walz / Michael Tobin vs Patty Fronberry / David Gahagan1-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 8.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Toboyek Team3090030
2Abhold Team0309972

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Micky Abhold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Michael Tobin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Candace Walz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Marina Melberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Michael Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Ken Redman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Walz + Michael Tobin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Micky Abhold
66W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Michael Tobin
71W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Candace Walz
45W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Marina Melberg
76W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Michael Finnegan
36W–61L career · 8 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Ken Redman
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.