Teams

Team 4 Over Served 4.0

2026 NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs Team 1 Sleigh the Day (and Night)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJill Holloman / Caroline Mia Lee vs Mary Newburn / Amanda Kerr7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRenee Wall / Mary Ann Larson vs Michelle Brown / Emily Covington6-3, 6-1
2026-03-12vs Team 5 Frosty ForehandsLost 12
W#1 DoublesRenee Wall / Erin Kaplan vs Valerie Ciccone / Sarah Schrieber6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Wendy Hopkins vs Nafeeza Nabibaksh / Wendy Hahn7-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesChristine Cegielski / Teri Fahlgren vs Julie Gowin / Michelle Moore4-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs Team 8 Resting Ace FaceWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Erin Kaplan vs Alisha Kim / Susan Velasco6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Cours / Kristin Musselman vs Kimberly Pease / Nancy Rowland6-0, 6-2
2026-02-22vs Team 3 Shotmakers-40Won 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Musselman / Wendy Hopkins vs Rosemary McEnery / Lisa Stock-Reusch6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeri Fahlgren / Jennifer Fox vs Cheryl Hughes / Maria Swale6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Word / Jessica Egenrieder vs Christine Bragale / Michelle Bryan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Team 7 SledgehammersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fox / Wendy Hopkins vs Suzanne Marisa / Andrea Schnappauf6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Holloman / Caroline Mia Lee vs Melissa Hampton / Kelly Yardley6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Cegielski / Teri Fahlgren vs Jessica Harris / Elizabeth Lucchesi6-3, 6-3
2026-02-05vs Team 6 Serve Me A Double 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin Kaplan / Renee Wall vs Cathy Huh / Ashley Plexico6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeri Fahlgren / Jennifer Fox vs Tracey White / Wendy Beale7-5, 5-5
W#3 DoublesKristin Musselman / Christine Cegielski vs Melissa Swearingen / Holly Rasmussen6-3, 5-5
2026-01-21vs Team 1 Sleigh the Day (and Night)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Musselman / Nancy Cours vs Tara Reynolds / Marcy Busch6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Cegielski / Jennifer Fox vs Mary Newburn / Stacy Huisman7-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Larson / Kate Putt vs Karyn DeVito / Amanda Kerr2-6, 5-7
2026-01-15vs Team 2 LadyBallersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Musselman / Jennifer Fox vs Carrie Gray / Kimberlee Overdeck2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Dawn Word vs June Wheatley / Kate Clancey2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKate Putt / Christine Cegielski vs Beth Taylor / Odette Clark Campbell6-4, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 2 LadyBallers8020413164
2Team 4 Over Served 4.06215921193
3Team 8 Resting Ace Face44131127201
4Team 1 Sleigh the Day (and Night)44131127216
5Team 7 Sledgehammers35131127232
6Team 6 Serve Me A Double 4.035101428233
7Team 5 Frosty Forehands3571738256
8Team 3 Shotmakers-401751936246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jill Holloman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Erin Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Kristin Musselman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.77
Nancy Cours
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Laura Sachwitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Christine Cegielski
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Jessica Egenrieder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Teri Fahlgren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Renee Wall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Caroline Mia Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Jennifer Fox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Dawn Word
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Kate Putt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Mia Lee + Jill Holloman14660% games+6.1% vs expected
Dawn Word + Caroline Mia Lee5066% games+6.0% vs expected
Nancy Cours + Christine Cegielski5263% games+0.9% vs expected
Jessica Egenrieder + Jill Holloman5358% games+0.1% vs expected
Jessica Egenrieder + Dawn Word283449% games−7.6% vs expected
Renee Wall + Jessica Egenrieder4159% gamesnot enough data
Teri Fahlgren + Jessica Egenrieder1442% gamesnot enough data
Teri Fahlgren + Dawn Word4153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Holloman
154W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
Erin Kaplan
40W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Kristin Musselman
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Nancy Cours
53W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Laura Sachwitz
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
4
Christine Cegielski
66W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Jessica Egenrieder
162W–168L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Teri Fahlgren
114W–115L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Renee Wall
231W–249L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Caroline Mia Lee
46W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jennifer Fox
14W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Dawn Word
98W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.