2 ACAC OLSON
2026 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women
17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA
Schedule8 played
i
Flight standings15 teams · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 CCV Heatstroke Heroes - Pierce | 7 | 1 | 28 | 236 |
| 28 KRA Kirkeby | 6 | 2 | 17 | 189 |
| 314 WOCC Purcell 40+ | 6 | 2 | 28 | 250 |
| 411 TDC-BBR - White | 6 | 2 | 32 | 250 |
| 513 Westwood Gee | 5 | 3 | 28 | 266 |
| 62 ACAC OLSON | 5 | 3 | 31 | 278 |
| 79 MTC Chenevert 40-3.0 | 5 | 3 | 32 | 284 |
| 81 ACAC Lee 3.0 | 5 | 3 | 35 | 265 |
| 97 KRA - Ware | 4 | 3 | 36 | 274 |
| 106 Hermitage Coates/Thompson | 3 | 5 | 43 | 292 |
| 114 Colonies Heller | 2 | 5 | 33 | 246 |
| 1215 Woodlake Schneeberger | 2 | 6 | 37 | 270 |
| 135 Colonies Thompson | 2 | 6 | 44 | 298 |
| 1412 Twin Hickory Chalk | 1 | 7 | 54 | 351 |
| 1510 Stonehenge Bull | 0 | 8 | 52 | 338 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Kelley Kent + Brooke Olson | 7–2 | 56% games | +1.8% vs expected |
| Kristin Gray + Ali Silva | 2–3 | 55% games | +1.0% vs expected |
| Pamela Blackburn + Jackie Granger | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Susan Winckler + Pamela Blackburn | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Heather Montague + Nicky Granback | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.