Teams

Bashi Bazouks

2022 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-12vs KF2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrent Kendall / David Whitall vs Fatih Selekler / Nathan Calem4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-04vs KF2Split 11
L#2 DoublesGregory Fox / David Whitall vs Nathan Calem / Richard Laukitis4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesZaf Basha / Brent Kendall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-19vs KF2Won 10
W#3 DoublesBengt Liljas / Joshua Folk vs Trevor Lessard / Henry Forster6-2, 6-3
2022-02-09vs KF2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrent Kendall / Bengt Liljas vs Sandeep Krishnan / Brian Kovalski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrent Kendall / John Payne vs Denis Vashuk / Fatih Selekler6-3, 6-3
2022-01-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Preston Peranich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-14vs KF2Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Whitall / Tzuhsiu Chiou vs Fatih Selekler / Sandeep Krishnan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Gregory Fox
published 4.5
3.91
Brent Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Bengt Liljas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Joshua Folk
published
3.59
David Whitall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Paul Brennan
published
John Payne
published
Taka Ariga
published
Zaf Basha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bengt Liljas + Brent Kendall7652% games−11.9% vs expected
Brent Kendall + David Whitall3251% gamesnot enough data
Bengt Liljas + David Whitall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gregory Fox
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Bengt Liljas
128W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
John Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taka Ariga
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zaf Basha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.