Teams

KY/LOU/REEDER

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.0 Women

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-23vs KY/LOU/WALKER/BERRYWon 41
L#1 DoublesNina Scott / Elita Roberts vs Emily Schmidt / Katherine Willis4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Mary Wallitsch6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Reeder / Amanda Kitchin vs Taryn Walker / Melanie Berry6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristen Brannon vs Bridgette Gorman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Zarobsky / Katasha Roberts vs Jessica Murr / Kelly Brown6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Judith Eckman
published
3.98
Jennifer Reeder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Katie Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Nina Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Mary Beth Zarobsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Elita Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Andi Ramser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Amanda Kitchin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Marcia Littlefield
published
3.53
Lily McDonogh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Bounthavy Hill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kristen Brannon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Tammie Taylor-Faber
published
3.43
Olga Snyder
published
3.40
Erin Ash
published
3.39
Julie Nakayima
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.31
Yelena Goldentul
published
3.29
Lisa Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Jennifer McAdams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katasha Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
MELANIE BABIN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nina Scott + Elita Roberts5263% games+1.0% vs expected
Marcia Littlefield + Kristen Brannon0521% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Mercado + Marcia Littlefield224 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Littlefield + Jennifer Reeder213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Reeder + Elita Roberts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Eckman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Jennifer Reeder
46W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Katie Schneider
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Nina Scott
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Mary Beth Zarobsky
23W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Elita Roberts
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Andi Ramser
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Amanda Kitchin
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Marcia Littlefield
16W–35L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Lily McDonogh
23W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Bounthavy Hill
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Kristen Brannon
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Tammie Taylor-Faber
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Olga Snyder
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Erin Ash
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Julie Nakayima
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Yelena Goldentul
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Lisa Mercado
30W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jennifer McAdams
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Katasha Roberts
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
MELANIE BABIN
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.