Teams

BROADSTONE RC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-18vs ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 40AW3.5ALost 13
L#1 DoublesJeanne Ferrell / Linda Mcclain vs Vinh Sae / Rhona Wu5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJing Yuan vs Kateryna Elitzin6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVivian Martin / Gladys Cornell vs Rosalie Calabrese / Denise Canacari6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Wilson / Rose Lunsmann vs Marion Sanders / Susie O'Brien7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Linda Mcclain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Elaine Yap
published 3.5
3.38
Jing Yuan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Vivian Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alissa Faith
published 3.5
3.19
Sandi Ammons
published
3.18
Jeanne Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Denise Chisick
published 3.5
3.12
Betty Williams
published 3.5
3.11
Gladys Cornell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Maggie Mei Choy
published
3.11
Jeannine Neves
published
2.97
Rose Lunsmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Melody Andaya
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Mcclain + Elaine Yap12757% games+7.2% vs expected
Jeanne Ferrell + Elaine Yap224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Ferrell + Sandi Ammons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Mcclain
32W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Elaine Yap
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jing Yuan
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
Vivian Martin
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Alissa Faith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandi Ammons
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeanne Ferrell
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Denise Chisick
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Betty Williams
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gladys Cornell
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
Maggie Mei Choy
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jeannine Neves
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Rose Lunsmann
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Melody Andaya
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.