Teams

YTC-MILLER TIME

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-01vs YTC-BeyerLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Vaughan / Angie Richardson vs Nate Fulton / Kristin Preacher1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Wing / Audrey James vs Quinn Plant / Erin Fulton7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Degrasse / Beata Miller vs Tyler Newman / Megan Beyer0-6, 5-7
2021-07-31vs PC-Happy HourLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Wing / Lisa Watkins vs Lisa Smith / Anthony Smith1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Richardson / Angie Richardson vs Joyce Donais / Don Donais2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRick Vaughan / Beata Miller vs Lindy Bentley / Randy Gable2-6, 2-6
2021-07-31vs YTC-Yakima Net SettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Miller / Audrey James vs Karl Lieberknecht / Cristeen Valicoff6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Richardson / Angie Richardson vs Liberty McLean / Aaron McLean6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Wing / Lisa Watkins vs Jody Snyder / Eric Rasmussen3-6, 1-6
2021-07-30vs CBRC-SamuelLost 12
W#1 DoublesRick Vaughan / Angie Richardson vs Jolene Boughton / Evan Mehlenbacher7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAudrey James / Jim Miller vs Angela Cragin / Adam Hrebeniuk1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Watkins / Craig Richardson vs Kristina Berg / Nikolla Qafoku2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lisa Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Rick Vaughan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Audrey James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Craig Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.63
Beata Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Angie Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bernard Loeffers
published
Robert Wing
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Richardson + Angie Richardson1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Watkins
73W–79L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 3 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
Rick Vaughan
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Audrey James
57W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Craig Richardson
1W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Beata Miller
66W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
Angie Richardson
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Bernard Loeffers
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Wing
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.