Teams

KY/LOU/LUCKETT

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & Over · 3.0 ADULT MIXED

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-02vs KY/LOU/MCLEROYWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Lewis / Jacob Lewis vs Lindsay Brown / Erik Helton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Lacap / Bill Lacap vs Charles Shaver / Liz Parker Miller3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Luckett / Patrick Wissing vs Amy Perpich / Bernard Abner6-2, 6-2
2025-07-27vs KY/LOU/UTTICHWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Dees / Caroline Elliott vs Greg Zeller / Lindsay Zeller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJames Fox / MARY CECIL vs Taylor Bockweg / Buddy Bockweg6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGeorge Goepfrich / Robbyn McClain vs Meredith Jones / Ryan Jones6-1, 7-5
2025-07-05vs KY/LOU/UTTICHWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobbyn McClain / Samuel McClain vs John Woock / Tracey Woock6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKyra Frederick / Patrick Wissing vs Rachel Miranda / Ryan Miranda6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Luckett / George Goepfrich vs Greg Zeller / Lindsay Zeller6-0, 6-0
2025-06-27vs KY/LOU/JACOBYLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllison Luckett / Samuel McClain vs Sara Ruby / Ben Jacoby6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMARY CECIL / George Goepfrich vs Thomas Solinger / Jennifer Solinger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Lacap / Bill Lacap vs Lisa Marsh / Hooks Hausman2-6, 3-6
2025-06-15vs KY/LOU/MCLEROYWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Elliott / Samuel McClain vs Laura Mahoney / Erik Helton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Deal / Michael Deal vs Janet Parrish / Charles Shaver6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Lewis / Jacob Lewis vs Kathy Klein / Bernard Abner6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Alex Steen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Alexandra Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Michael Dees
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lisa Steen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Jacob Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Alexandra Deal
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Samuel McClain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Caroline Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Robbyn McClain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kyra Frederick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Allison Luckett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Annie Kuzmicky
published 3
2.84
Patrick Wissing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
MARY CECIL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Michael Deal
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.80
James Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Rachel Lacap
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bill Lacap
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Natoshia Goepfrich
published
George Goepfrich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Deal + Michael Deal4262% games+17.9% vs expected
Jacob Lewis + Alexandra Lewis5450% games+13.2% vs expected
Samuel McClain + Robbyn McClain3358% gamesnot enough data
Kyra Frederick + Patrick Wissing3242% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Lacap + Bill Lacap224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Steen + Alex Steen303 matchesnot enough data
MARY CECIL + James Fox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Steen
20W–10L career · type D · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Alexandra Lewis
18W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Michael Dees
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Lisa Steen
173W–163L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Jacob Lewis
16W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Alexandra Deal
20W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Samuel McClain
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Caroline Elliott
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Robbyn McClain
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Kyra Frederick
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Allison Luckett
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Annie Kuzmicky
20W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Patrick Wissing
26W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
MARY CECIL
26W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Michael Deal
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
James Fox
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Rachel Lacap
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Bill Lacap
2W–2L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natoshia Goepfrich
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
George Goepfrich
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.