Teams

Berreth 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesKathy Pace / Robyn Manning vs Danielle Broadstreet / Lynette Paley4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Robyn Manning vs Cheryl Scott / Danielle Broadstreet3-3
2024-09-23vs Chance 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesKrisla Berreth / Sallye Parker vs Susan Calkins / Jennie Pekarne6-2, 7-5
2024-09-09vs Majestic 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Marsha Tice vs Carrie Ganim / Mary Dean2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Marsha Tice vs Danielle Broadstreet / Cheryl Scott3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Pace / Robyn Manning vs Bonnie Satterfield / Lynette Paley6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.69
Pam McAmis
published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
published 3.5
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
Jacqueline Bell
published 3.5
3.21
Robyn Manning
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jacqueline Bell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Manning
139W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.