Teams

LTC:Lexington:Jimenez

2025 EMA Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-16vs WAC:Waltham:VivekLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Roesch / Matthew Strong vs Hanneke de Vlaam - Siegers / Jonathan Wagner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Perry / Eduardo Jimenez vs Mui Tran / Vivek Allu5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesApril McDermott / Mario Merino-Rivas vs Julia Campbell / Charles Kerr2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesLucia Wolfe / Jake Wang vs Alexi Losano / Christopher Weiss1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSimone Alpen / Rakesh Reddy vs Karla Almendarez / Pavankumar Anne2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJane Parry / Thomas Connolly vs Justin Sordillo / Lindsey McCabe2-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs WIG:Wightman:Kenney/KenneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucia Wolfe / Luca Greco vs Adisa de Jesus / Carlos Lopez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRenee Perry / Eduardo Jimenez vs Lisa Kenney / Mark Starrett2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Lilley / Mario Merino-Rivas vs MEREDITH MULHEARN / James Porter3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Roesch / Luca Greco vs Lauren Moretti / Michael Aruta6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEduardo Jimenez / Renee Perry vs Janis Mulrooney / Christopher Weiss6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Lilley / Matthew Strong vs Matthew Williams / Maureen Mullen6-7, 3-6
2025-03-07vs WAC:Waltham:VivekLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Connolly / Jennifer Roesch vs Julia Campbell / Ross Kennedy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Perry / Jake Wang vs Hanneke de Vlaam - Siegers / Victor Suarez1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEduardo Jimenez / Jane Parry vs Maitane Sesma / Jonathan Wagner1-6, 1-4
2025-02-21vs WIG:Wightman:Kenney/KenneyLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril McDermott / Matthew Strong vs Ciaran O'Neill / Meg Smith4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lilley / Luca Greco vs Catherine Burns / James Medeiros7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabriella Dadoly / Mario Merino-Rivas vs Lisa Kenney / John Kenney6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Eduardo Jimenez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.05
Lucia Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Rielly Malz
published
3.97
Matthew Strong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Luca Greco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Jake Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anne Burke
published 4
3.74
Squall Hoang
published
3.60
Meredith Lilley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
April McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Mario Merino-Rivas
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Gabriella Dadoly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Parry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Roesch
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Rakesh Reddy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Simone Alpen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Connolly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April McDermott + Mario Merino-Rivas2444% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Strong + April McDermott033 matchesnot enough data
Renee Perry + Eduardo Jimenez033 matchesnot enough data
Eduardo Jimenez + Jennifer Roesch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eduardo Jimenez
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Lucia Wolfe
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Rielly Malz
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Matthew Strong
7W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Luca Greco
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Jake Wang
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Anne Burke
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Squall Hoang
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.74
Meredith Lilley
21W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
April McDermott
4W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Mario Merino-Rivas
47W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Gabriella Dadoly
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Parry
2W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Roesch
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rakesh Reddy
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Perry
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Simone Alpen
20W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Connolly
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.